Donald Trump does not have a single, coherent “development plan” for the Muslim world. Instead, his approach is largely transactional and security-driven, shaped by the principle of “America First.” Countries are valued only insofar as they provide direct economic, political, or security benefits to the United States.
Trump’s policy divides the Muslim world into two broad categories:
“useful allies”—mainly wealthy and compliant states—and “problematic actors”—independent or resistant countries that face pressure, sanctions, and containment.
A central pillar of this approach is unconditional support for Israel, including pushing Muslim countries toward normalization while sidelining the Palestinian issue. At the same time, Trump views most forms of political Islam through a security lens, often failing to distinguish between moderate and extremist movements.
---
Major Risks for the Muslim World
1. Deepening divisions among Muslim countries, preventing real regional cooperation.
2. Normalization of repression, as allied governments gain political cover for domestic crackdowns.
3. Economic pressure through sanctions and financial tools, harming ordinary people more than governments.
4. Reproduction of extremism, as prolonged injustice and humiliation fuel radical reactions.
---
How to Respond Effectively
At the state level:
Reduce dependence on the United States by diversifying political and economic partnerships.
Pursue pragmatic regional cooperation.
Engage in rational, interest-based diplomacy rather than emotional confrontation.
At the elite and media level:
Produce independent narratives instead of purely reactive or ideological ones.
Expose double standards without falling into conspiracy thinking.
At the societal level:
Promote political awareness without extremism.
Strengthen internal capacities—economy, education, and social cohesion.
Separate American society from U.S. political leadership.
---
Conclusion
Trump’s strategy toward the Muslim world is not about development, but about management, containment, and exploitation. The greatest danger lies not only in his policies, but in internal weakness, division, and emotional reactions within Muslim societies. The most effective response is internal strength, political rationality, and regional cooperation.