Washington claims to be trying to manage tensions and establish a ceasefire, especially in Lebanon, which has in fact become the "driving engine" of the war. The fact that the Americans talk about reducing tensions in official forums and calling on both sides to exercise restraint is completely "contrary" to what they do on the ground, and do not hesitate to provide any military, security, economic, political and diplomatic assistance to the Israeli regime to continue the war.

There is ample evidence to show that, contrary to the statements of American statesmen who so-called call for a ceasefire and avoidance of conflict in Lebanon, the Biden administration and the White House are not simply passive allies that the Zionists sometimes defy, but rather, at every point in the developments in Lebanon, they are a "government in sync and aligned" with the Zionist regime.

Recently, Reuters published a report revealing the true dimensions of US policy towards Lebanon and Hezbollah. Referring to the words of US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller regarding Washington's support for Tel Aviv's actions in targeting Hezbollah's infrastructure, he emphasized: "The policy of resolving the tension between Hezbollah in Lebanon and Tel Aviv through diplomacy is no longer the US approach to developments in West Asia, and Washington is no longer inclined to prevent war."

This change in approach has become "clearer" especially after the Zionist regime's "terrorist campaign" in Lebanon, which led to the martyrdom of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and a number of senior Hezbollah commanders, and the US has become "more clear" with the idea that Hezbollah has been defeated. Its power is seeking to change political trends in Lebanon after the loss of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah.

The US government is seeking to reduce Hezbollah's influence and subsequently "eliminate" it from Lebanon's political future by any means possible, including supporting the Zionist regime's war against Hezbollah and Lebanon, tarnishing Hezbollah's image, creating a cost for resistance in Lebanese public opinion, and ... inciting people and various political movements against the party. May Allah blame all the existing problems and difficulties on Hezbollah. Lebanese Resistance

Recently, the American website Axios reported on a new US plan to change the power equations in Lebanon and revealed, quoting American officials: “The White House intends to exploit the current situation of Hezbollah in Lebanon to elect a new Lebanese president as soon as possible. "

This is while the US ambassador to Lebanon, in a meeting with some political forces and independent representatives of the parliament, in statements completely disproportionate to Hezbollah's position and situation in the field and the region, implicitly said: "Hezbollah has been weakened and Hezbollah has been weakened. Control over the government is no longer tolerable. In the near future, we must prepare ourselves for a stage in Lebanese politics in which Hezbollah will have no place.

In short, America has turned to a complex and double game in the region and Lebanon. Despite its gestures in the field of human rights and..., Washington is the main cause of the massacre in Lebanon and occupied Palestine. Other Western countries are also not taking effective steps to establish a ceasefire and stop the Zionist regime's war in Lebanon and are in a way following US policies. Of course, France is trying to play a role in the Lebanese political atmosphere in a relatively realistic way by maintaining its former colonial approaches and interacting with Hezbollah.

Without American support, the Zionist regime cannot last more than a few days against the Lebanese resistance, whose combat organization has not been damaged even after the assassination of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah.

By monitoring the trends and developments on the ground, and especially in Lebanon, it seems that a large and joint regional agenda is underway under the leadership of the United States to change the "political and security order" governing Lebanon if possible. Eliminating Hezbollah from its political future

Of course, Lebanon is the starting point of the order desired by the United States, which, depending on the outlook for developments, may also be followed in other Arab countries, including Syria and even America's Arab partners in the region. The United States, which lacks the necessary conditions to directly enter into war and conflict in the region and Lebanon, is well aware of the political, social, cultural, etc. relations between the people of Lebanon and Hezbollah. Therefore, it considers the people's "interest" in Hezbollah an "obstacle" to advancing and realizing its political programs in this country. Therefore, it considers military action, war, and displacement to be the only effective way to sever these interests and ties, and consequently eliminate Hezbollah from Lebanon’s political future.

However, contrary to the Americans’ view, Hezbollah has not been weakened, and there is no clear evidence or sign of Hezbollah’s military and field weakening in Lebanon, and the scene of the clashes also confirms this. Furthermore, Hezbollah, as it has shown in practice, is committed to Lebanon’s interests, security, and national sovereignty, and welcomes any ceasefire plan that takes into account the interests of the Lebanese people and the country’s resistance.

Hamid Khoshaiyan